Recent Justice-Related Publications of ISJR Members
Ballard, A., & Easteal, P. (2014). Mapping the legal pathways for workplace bullying: A preliminary overview. Alternative Law Journal, 39, 94- 98.
Baumert, A., Schlösser, T. & Schmitt, M. (2014). Economic games: Performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 178-192.
Brown-Ianuzzi, J., Lundberg, K., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (in press). Subjective status shapes political preferences and interpersonal blame. Psychological Science.
Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Dawtry, R. J. (in press). Making sense of misfortune: Deservingness, self-esteem, and patterns of self-defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Campbell, T., & Kay, A. C. (in press). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Carline, A., & Easteal, P. (2014). Domestic and Sexual Violence Against Women - Law Reform and Society: Shades of Grey. London: Routledge. (see flyer under justice related books)
Easteal, P., Warden, C.W., & Young, L. (2014). The Kennon “Factor”: Issues of indeterminacy and floodgates. Australian Journal of Family Law, 28, 1-28.
Friesen, J. P., Campbell, T., & Kay, A. C. (in press). The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: The appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Friesen, J. P., Kay, A C., Eibach, R. P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Seeking structure in social organization: Compensatory control and the psychological advantage of hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 590-609.
Graham, J. (2014). Morality beyond the lab [Perspective on Hoffmann, Brandt, Wisneski, & Skitka, 2014]. Science, 345, 1242.
Graham, J., Meindl, P., Koleva, S., Iyer, R., & Johnson, K. M. (in press). When values and behavior conflict: Moral pluralism and intrapersonal moral hypocrisy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass.
Gray, L., Easteal, P., & Bartels, L. (2014). Proving family violence under the Family Violence Exception (Migration Regulations 1994 Cth): Will the 2012 changes ameliorate process and evidentiary issues? Alternative Law Journal, 39, 167-171
Gromet, D. M. & Okimoto, T. G. (2014). Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on reintegration. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 411-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq20147814
Johnson, K. M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., Vaisey, S., Miles, A., Chu, V., & Graham, J. (in press). Ideology-specific patterns of moral indifference predict intentions not to vote. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy.
Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B. A., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, J. (2014). Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56-81.
Judd, K., Easteal, P., & Holland, K. (2015). Enduring themes and silences in media portrayals of violence against women. Women Studies International Forum, 48, 103-113.
Koleva, S., Selterman, D., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Graham, J. (2014). The moral compass of insecurity: Anxious and avoidant attachment predict moral judgment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 185-194.
McOrmond-Plummer, L., Easteal, P., & Levy-Peck, J. (Eds.) (2013). Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Survivor Support and System Change. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. (see flyer under justice related books)
Meindl, P., & Graham, J. (2014). Know thy participant: The trouble with nomothetic assumptions in moral psychology. In H. Sarkissian and J. C. Wright (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology (pp. 233-252). London: Bloomsbury.
Okimoto, T. G. & Wenzel, M. (2014). Bridging diverging perspectives and restoration goals in the aftermath of workplace transgressions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 443-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201471515
Okimoto, T. G. (2014). Toward more interesting research questions: Problematizing theory in social justice. Social Justice Research, 27(3), 395-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0215-5
Proudfoot, D., & Kay, A. C. (in press). Reactance of rationalization? Predicting public responses to government policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Scherer, A. M., Windschitl, P. D., & Graham, J. (in press). An ideological house of mirrors: Political stereotypes as exaggerations of motivated social cognition differences. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (in press). When government confidence undermines public involvement in modern disasters. Social Cognition.
Smith, I., Aquino, K., Koleva, S., & Graham, J. (2014). The moral ties that bind…even to outgroups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25, 1554-1562.
Stone, S. J., Johnson, K. M., Bell, E., Meindl, P., Smith, B. J., & Graham, J. (2014). Political psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5, 373-385.
Tang, S., Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Do difficult decisions motivate belief in fate? A test in the context of the 2012 U.S. Presidential election. Psychological Science, 25, 1046-1048.
Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. (2014). Awe, uncertainty, and agency detection. Psychological Science, 25, 170-178.
Van der Toorn, J., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Twenty years of system justification theory: Introduction to the special issue on “ideology and system justification processes.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 413-419.
Van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay., A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C. (in press). Powerlessness increases system justification: Implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy, and government. Political Psychology.
Van der Toorn, J., Jost, J. T., & Berkics, M. (2014). Job satisfaction and perceived fairness in Hungary and the USA. In Michalos, A. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3454-3458). Springer Publishers.
Van der Toorn, J., Nail, P. R., Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2014). My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 50-60.
Van Leeuwen, F., Koenig, B. L., Graham, J., & Park, J. H. (2014). Moral concerns across the United States: Associations with life-history variables, pathogen prevalence, urbanization, cognitive ability, and social class. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 464-471.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Van Dijk, E. (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63-73.
Waytz, A., Iyer, R., Young, L., & Graham, J. (in press). Ideological differences in the expanse of empathy. In Valdesolo, P. & Graham, J., (Eds.), Bridging Ideological Divides (Claremont Series on Applied Social Psychology). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Wenzel, M. & Okimoto, T. G. (2014). On the relationship between justice and forgiveness: Are all forms of justice made equal? British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(3), 463-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12040 Streicher, B., Graupmann, V. & Weisweiler, S. (2014). A spoonful of fairness: Training in fairness principles helps communicate bad news. International Journal of Training Research, 12, 71-82.
Whitson, J., Galinsky, A. G., & Kay, A. C. (in press). The emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and paranormal belief. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Wu, M.S., Schmitt, M., Zhou, C., Nartova-Bochaver, S., Astania, N., Khachatryan, N. & Han, B. (2014). Examining self-advantage in the suffering of others: Cross-cultural differences in beneficiary and observer justice sensitivity among Chinese, Germans, and Russians. Social Justice Research, 27, 231-242. DOI: 10.1007/s11211-014-0212-8
Yeung, A., Kay, A. C., & Peach, J. (in press). Anti-feminist backlash: The role of system justification in the rejection of feminism. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.